The approach taken over the last two decades of quantifying global human health outcomes through quality- and disability-adjusted life years (QALYs and DALYs) has provided more informed and better targeted, data-driven policy decisions to improve health . A successful delivery of the Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme(1)
is not only potentially equally transformative in the animal health sector, it can also enhance our understanding of human health outcomes.
Many endemic and emerging diseases are zoonotic in origin, transmitted between humans and animals. Existing estimates of the burden of these shared pathogens would benefit from robust quantification of their status in livestock populations, especially when categorised by production system, as these factors are key determinants in human exposure and the possible human health impact. Combining veterinary and public health interventions in locations where both animal and human populations are affected is an essential part of managing these diseases. Since most emerging pathogens are zoonotic , routine tracking of animal health is needed to identify anomalous patterns.
Diet and food safety
Given the significant contribution of the livestock sector to global diets , any quantification of the quality and safety of products consumed by humans is important. Estimates of the impact of unsafe food suggest a significant but manageable burden ; detailing which livestock species are affected by key food-borne pathogens in which locations would enable necessary interventions in the appropriate sectors. Quantifying production losses, as well as potential losses of any dietary nutrients, will focus efforts on improving food security and enriching local diets through improved livestock health.
Future of human health
The fate of humans and livestock is inextricably linked. While forecasts of human health currently incorporate the trajectories of key risk factors, such as smoking , the future of livestock species is rarely addressed in a comprehensive manner through consensus processes. A robust contemporary estimate of animal health, and its effect on humans, is a necessary foundation to develop forecasts that show how animal health policies could alter human health trajectories for decades to come.